![]() Previously, he was Director of Electronic Discovery at that company. Florez had been the Director of Impact Forensics, a computer forensics examiner with its own forensics laboratory, since 2006. ![]() He can surely testify about technical matters that are beyond the ordinary experience of most jurors. Defendant conceded that “Carl Florez knows his way around computers. Reisman was expected to testify to his opinions on the adequacy and shortcomings of Florez’s digital forensics investigation and report.Ĭarl Florez’s computer electronics expertise was not in dispute. Florez was expected to testify to his opinions on the adequacy of data protections measures at USG and the manner and extent to which USG documents were obtained by Lafarge. The court simultaneously considered Plaintiff’s motion to preclude the testimony of Defendants’ computer forensics expert Andrew Reisman. ![]() Defendants moved to exclude the testimony of Plaintiff’s computer forensics expert Carl Florez. (“Lafarge”), and several Lafarge employees, infringed USG’s patents and stolen confidential information relating to wallboard manufacture. 2009)īackground: Plaintiff United States Gypsum Company (“USG”) claimed that Defendants Lafarge North America, Inc. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |